Add a read-only role per app for calendar, feedback and tickets
A grant can now be `read` instead of `access`: requireAppAccess lets it through for GET/HEAD/OPTIONS and answers 403 to every other method, so new write routes are covered without being marked. `read` and `access` on the same app are rejected together; user management has no read role. /tickets/admin/me and /feedback/admin/me report `readOnly`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
9 files changed
+377
-10
No files matched your search
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ import {requireAppAccess, requireSignedIn, resolveAccess} from '../../src/models
|
||||
const mockGetSession = auth.api.getSession as unknown as Mock;
|
||||
const mockLoadAccess = UsersService.loadAccess as Mock;
|
||||
|
||||
const makeReq = (): Request => ({headers: {cookie: 'nachklang.session_token=abc'}} as unknown as Request);
|
||||
const makeReq = (method = 'GET'): Request => ({method, headers: {cookie: 'nachklang.session_token=abc'}} as unknown as Request);
|
||||
|
||||
const makeRes = (): Response => {
|
||||
const res: any = {};
|
||||
@@ -219,4 +219,62 @@ describe('requireAppAccess', () => {
|
||||
|
||||
expect(next).toHaveBeenCalled();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
describe('read-only grant', () => {
|
||||
const readOnlyUser = {
|
||||
...activeUser,
|
||||
permissions: [{app: 'tickets', role: 'read'}],
|
||||
apps: ['tickets']
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
it.each(['GET', 'HEAD', 'OPTIONS'])('lets %s through', async method => {
|
||||
mockGetSession.mockResolvedValue({user: {id: 'u1'}});
|
||||
mockLoadAccess.mockResolvedValue(readOnlyUser);
|
||||
const res = makeRes();
|
||||
const next = vi.fn();
|
||||
|
||||
await requireAppAccess('tickets')(makeReq(method), res, next);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(next).toHaveBeenCalled();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it.each(['POST', 'PUT', 'PATCH', 'DELETE'])('403s %s', async method => {
|
||||
mockGetSession.mockResolvedValue({user: {id: 'u1'}});
|
||||
mockLoadAccess.mockResolvedValue(readOnlyUser);
|
||||
const res = makeRes();
|
||||
const next = vi.fn();
|
||||
|
||||
await requireAppAccess('tickets')(makeReq(method), res, next);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(res.status).toHaveBeenCalledWith(403);
|
||||
expect(res.send).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.objectContaining({message: 'Du hast für diesen Bereich nur Lesezugriff.'}));
|
||||
expect(next).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('does not let full access to another app write here', async () => {
|
||||
mockGetSession.mockResolvedValue({user: {id: 'u1'}});
|
||||
mockLoadAccess.mockResolvedValue({
|
||||
...activeUser,
|
||||
permissions: [{app: 'tickets', role: 'read'}, {app: 'feedback', role: 'access'}],
|
||||
apps: ['feedback', 'tickets']
|
||||
});
|
||||
const res = makeRes();
|
||||
const next = vi.fn();
|
||||
|
||||
await requireAppAccess('tickets')(makeReq('POST'), res, next);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(res.status).toHaveBeenCalledWith(403);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('lets full access write', async () => {
|
||||
mockGetSession.mockResolvedValue({user: {id: 'u1'}});
|
||||
mockLoadAccess.mockResolvedValue(activeUser);
|
||||
const res = makeRes();
|
||||
const next = vi.fn();
|
||||
|
||||
await requireAppAccess('feedback')(makeReq('DELETE'), res, next);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(next).toHaveBeenCalled();
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
@@ -1,9 +1,12 @@
|
||||
import {describe, expect, it} from 'vitest';
|
||||
import {
|
||||
ACCESS_ROLE,
|
||||
READ_ROLE,
|
||||
appsOf,
|
||||
canWrite,
|
||||
isAppPermission,
|
||||
isAppRole,
|
||||
isReadOnly,
|
||||
toPermissions
|
||||
} from '../../src/models/admin/admin.schema.js';
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -59,6 +62,44 @@ describe('toPermissions', () => {
|
||||
it('reads an empty list as "no permissions", not as invalid', () => {
|
||||
expect(toPermissions([])).toEqual([]);
|
||||
});
|
||||
it('reads the read-only role', () => {
|
||||
expect(toPermissions([{app: 'tickets', role: READ_ROLE}])).toEqual([
|
||||
{app: 'tickets', role: READ_ROLE}
|
||||
]);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('rejects full and read-only access to the same app together', () => {
|
||||
expect(toPermissions(['tickets', {app: 'tickets', role: READ_ROLE}])).toBeNull();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('allows full access to one app next to read-only access to another', () => {
|
||||
expect(toPermissions(['tickets', {app: 'feedback', role: READ_ROLE}])).toEqual([
|
||||
{app: 'tickets', role: ACCESS_ROLE},
|
||||
{app: 'feedback', role: READ_ROLE}
|
||||
]);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('rejects read-only access to user management', () => {
|
||||
expect(toPermissions([{app: 'admin', role: READ_ROLE}])).toBeNull();
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
describe('canWrite / isReadOnly', () => {
|
||||
it('lets only the access role write', () => {
|
||||
const permissions = [
|
||||
{app: 'tickets' as const, role: ACCESS_ROLE},
|
||||
{app: 'feedback' as const, role: READ_ROLE}
|
||||
];
|
||||
expect(canWrite(permissions, 'tickets')).toBe(true);
|
||||
expect(canWrite(permissions, 'feedback')).toBe(false);
|
||||
expect(isReadOnly(permissions, 'tickets')).toBe(false);
|
||||
expect(isReadOnly(permissions, 'feedback')).toBe(true);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('is neither for an app without any grant', () => {
|
||||
expect(canWrite([], 'calendar')).toBe(false);
|
||||
expect(isReadOnly([], 'calendar')).toBe(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
describe('isAppRole', () => {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user