A grant can now be `read` instead of `access`: requireAppAccess lets it through for GET/HEAD/OPTIONS and answers 403 to every other method, so new write routes are covered without being marked. `read` and `access` on the same app are rejected together; user management has no read role. /tickets/admin/me and /feedback/admin/me report `readOnly`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
281 lines
8.4 KiB
TypeScript
281 lines
8.4 KiB
TypeScript
import {vi, describe, it, expect, beforeEach, type Mock} from 'vitest';
|
|
import {Request, Response} from 'express';
|
|
|
|
vi.mock('../../src/models/admin/admin.auth.js', () => ({
|
|
auth: {api: {getSession: vi.fn()}}
|
|
}));
|
|
vi.mock('../../src/models/admin/users/users.admin.service.js', () => ({
|
|
loadAccess: vi.fn()
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
import {auth} from '../../src/models/admin/admin.auth.js';
|
|
import * as UsersService from '../../src/models/admin/users/users.admin.service.js';
|
|
import {requireAppAccess, requireSignedIn, resolveAccess} from '../../src/models/admin/admin.middleware.js';
|
|
|
|
const mockGetSession = auth.api.getSession as unknown as Mock;
|
|
const mockLoadAccess = UsersService.loadAccess as Mock;
|
|
|
|
const makeReq = (method = 'GET'): Request => ({method, headers: {cookie: 'nachklang.session_token=abc'}} as unknown as Request);
|
|
|
|
const makeRes = (): Response => {
|
|
const res: any = {};
|
|
res.status = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(res);
|
|
res.send = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(res);
|
|
res.locals = {};
|
|
return res as Response;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const activeUser = {
|
|
id: 'u1',
|
|
email: 'a@nachklang.art',
|
|
displayName: 'A',
|
|
disabled: false,
|
|
permissions: [
|
|
{app: 'feedback', role: 'access'},
|
|
{app: 'admin', role: 'access'}
|
|
],
|
|
apps: ['feedback', 'admin']
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
describe('resolveAccess', () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
mockGetSession.mockReset();
|
|
mockLoadAccess.mockReset();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('returns null without a valid session', async () => {
|
|
mockGetSession.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
expect(await resolveAccess(makeReq())).toBeNull();
|
|
expect(mockLoadAccess).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('returns null when the session points at a user row that is gone', async () => {
|
|
mockGetSession.mockResolvedValue({user: {id: 'u1'}});
|
|
mockLoadAccess.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
expect(await resolveAccess(makeReq())).toBeNull();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('resolves identity and permissions in a single permission query', async () => {
|
|
mockGetSession.mockResolvedValue({user: {id: 'u1'}});
|
|
mockLoadAccess.mockResolvedValue(activeUser);
|
|
|
|
expect(await resolveAccess(makeReq())).toEqual({
|
|
id: 'u1',
|
|
email: 'a@nachklang.art',
|
|
displayName: 'A',
|
|
disabled: false,
|
|
permissions: [
|
|
{app: 'feedback', role: 'access'},
|
|
{app: 'admin', role: 'access'}
|
|
],
|
|
apps: ['feedback', 'admin']
|
|
});
|
|
// No cookieCache: exactly one lookup per request, never zero.
|
|
expect(mockLoadAccess).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('requireSignedIn', () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
mockGetSession.mockReset();
|
|
mockLoadAccess.mockReset();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('401s without a session', async () => {
|
|
mockGetSession.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
const res = makeRes();
|
|
const next = vi.fn();
|
|
|
|
await requireSignedIn(makeReq(), res, next);
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toHaveBeenCalledWith(401);
|
|
expect(next).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('403s a disabled user that still holds a valid cookie', async () => {
|
|
mockGetSession.mockResolvedValue({user: {id: 'u1'}});
|
|
mockLoadAccess.mockResolvedValue({...activeUser, disabled: true});
|
|
const res = makeRes();
|
|
const next = vi.fn();
|
|
|
|
await requireSignedIn(makeReq(), res, next);
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toHaveBeenCalledWith(403);
|
|
expect(next).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('admits a signed-in user with no app permissions at all', async () => {
|
|
mockGetSession.mockResolvedValue({user: {id: 'u1'}});
|
|
mockLoadAccess.mockResolvedValue({...activeUser, apps: []});
|
|
const res = makeRes();
|
|
const next = vi.fn();
|
|
|
|
await requireSignedIn(makeReq(), res, next);
|
|
|
|
expect(next).toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
expect(res.locals.admin.apps).toEqual([]);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('requireAppAccess', () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
mockGetSession.mockReset();
|
|
mockLoadAccess.mockReset();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('401s without a session', async () => {
|
|
mockGetSession.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
const res = makeRes();
|
|
const next = vi.fn();
|
|
|
|
await requireAppAccess('feedback')(makeReq(), res, next);
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toHaveBeenCalledWith(401);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('403s a signed-in user without that app permission', async () => {
|
|
mockGetSession.mockResolvedValue({user: {id: 'u1'}});
|
|
mockLoadAccess.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
...activeUser,
|
|
permissions: [{app: 'feedback', role: 'access'}],
|
|
apps: ['feedback']
|
|
});
|
|
const res = makeRes();
|
|
const next = vi.fn();
|
|
|
|
await requireAppAccess('tickets')(makeReq(), res, next);
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toHaveBeenCalledWith(403);
|
|
expect(next).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('403s a disabled user even when they hold the permission', async () => {
|
|
mockGetSession.mockResolvedValue({user: {id: 'u1'}});
|
|
mockLoadAccess.mockResolvedValue({...activeUser, disabled: true});
|
|
const res = makeRes();
|
|
const next = vi.fn();
|
|
|
|
await requireAppAccess('feedback')(makeReq(), res, next);
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toHaveBeenCalledWith(403);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('passes through and exposes the identity the feedback/tickets services expect', async () => {
|
|
mockGetSession.mockResolvedValue({user: {id: 'u1'}});
|
|
mockLoadAccess.mockResolvedValue(activeUser);
|
|
const res = makeRes();
|
|
const next = vi.fn();
|
|
|
|
await requireAppAccess('feedback')(makeReq(), res, next);
|
|
|
|
expect(next).toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
expect(res.locals.admin).toMatchObject({id: 'u1', email: 'a@nachklang.art', displayName: 'A'});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('500s (never allows through) when the permission query throws', async () => {
|
|
mockGetSession.mockResolvedValue({user: {id: 'u1'}});
|
|
mockLoadAccess.mockRejectedValue(new Error('db down'));
|
|
const res = makeRes();
|
|
const next = vi.fn();
|
|
|
|
await requireAppAccess('feedback')(makeReq(), res, next);
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toHaveBeenCalledWith(500);
|
|
expect(next).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// The seam a finer per-app permission arrives through. Nothing passes a role
|
|
// today, so these two pin the behaviour before there is anything to break.
|
|
it('403s when a specific role is required and the user only holds another', async () => {
|
|
mockGetSession.mockResolvedValue({user: {id: 'u1'}});
|
|
mockLoadAccess.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
...activeUser,
|
|
permissions: [{app: 'tickets', role: 'access'}],
|
|
apps: ['tickets']
|
|
});
|
|
const res = makeRes();
|
|
const next = vi.fn();
|
|
|
|
await requireAppAccess('tickets', 'refund')(makeReq(), res, next);
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toHaveBeenCalledWith(403);
|
|
expect(next).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('passes when the user holds exactly the required role', async () => {
|
|
mockGetSession.mockResolvedValue({user: {id: 'u1'}});
|
|
mockLoadAccess.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
...activeUser,
|
|
permissions: [
|
|
{app: 'tickets', role: 'access'},
|
|
{app: 'tickets', role: 'refund'}
|
|
],
|
|
apps: ['tickets']
|
|
});
|
|
const res = makeRes();
|
|
const next = vi.fn();
|
|
|
|
await requireAppAccess('tickets', 'refund')(makeReq(), res, next);
|
|
|
|
expect(next).toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('read-only grant', () => {
|
|
const readOnlyUser = {
|
|
...activeUser,
|
|
permissions: [{app: 'tickets', role: 'read'}],
|
|
apps: ['tickets']
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
it.each(['GET', 'HEAD', 'OPTIONS'])('lets %s through', async method => {
|
|
mockGetSession.mockResolvedValue({user: {id: 'u1'}});
|
|
mockLoadAccess.mockResolvedValue(readOnlyUser);
|
|
const res = makeRes();
|
|
const next = vi.fn();
|
|
|
|
await requireAppAccess('tickets')(makeReq(method), res, next);
|
|
|
|
expect(next).toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it.each(['POST', 'PUT', 'PATCH', 'DELETE'])('403s %s', async method => {
|
|
mockGetSession.mockResolvedValue({user: {id: 'u1'}});
|
|
mockLoadAccess.mockResolvedValue(readOnlyUser);
|
|
const res = makeRes();
|
|
const next = vi.fn();
|
|
|
|
await requireAppAccess('tickets')(makeReq(method), res, next);
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toHaveBeenCalledWith(403);
|
|
expect(res.send).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.objectContaining({message: 'Du hast für diesen Bereich nur Lesezugriff.'}));
|
|
expect(next).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('does not let full access to another app write here', async () => {
|
|
mockGetSession.mockResolvedValue({user: {id: 'u1'}});
|
|
mockLoadAccess.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
...activeUser,
|
|
permissions: [{app: 'tickets', role: 'read'}, {app: 'feedback', role: 'access'}],
|
|
apps: ['feedback', 'tickets']
|
|
});
|
|
const res = makeRes();
|
|
const next = vi.fn();
|
|
|
|
await requireAppAccess('tickets')(makeReq('POST'), res, next);
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toHaveBeenCalledWith(403);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('lets full access write', async () => {
|
|
mockGetSession.mockResolvedValue({user: {id: 'u1'}});
|
|
mockLoadAccess.mockResolvedValue(activeUser);
|
|
const res = makeRes();
|
|
const next = vi.fn();
|
|
|
|
await requireAppAccess('feedback')(makeReq('DELETE'), res, next);
|
|
|
|
expect(next).toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
});
|